Apology
Sunday, May 28th, 2006I have made the editorial decision to leave the previous post despite a range of comments I recieved on it, which most of you didn’t see.
I’m sorry to have offended those of you who I did: what I wrote was unacceptable and unneccesary.
The post was somewhat reactionary, and those of you who know me or who have read other content on the site will understand that it was a mis-directed rant, and not intended to be taken seriously, or as a personal attack.
I agree that one has to be careful with what one places in the public domain, and in my case I have to be careful with the tone and intent of my pieces. In this case the post was intended to be a comment on the state of the world’s communication, and the way electronic communication has changed the way we interact. Instead of writing a dissertation about politics and the world in general, I started a more personalised rant, which was taken as a personal attack.
--> I have made the editorial decision to leave the previous post despite a range of comments I recieved on it, which most of you didn’t see. I’m sorry to have offended those of you who I did: what I wrote was unacceptable and unneccesary. The post was somewhat reactionary, and those of you who know me or who have read other content on the site will understand that it was a mis-directed rant, and not intended to be taken seriously, or as a personal attack. I agree that one has to be careful with what one places in the public domain, and in my case I have to be careful with the tone and intent of my pieces. In this case the post was intended to be a comment on the state of the world’s communication, and the way electronic communication has changed the way we interact. Instead of writing a dissertation about politics and the world in general, I started a more personalised rant, which was taken as a personal attack.